What is the difference between SCI and SCIE Journals? In practical terms, there is virtually no distinction today. The distinction is purely historical. This guide will explain the official 2020 update from Clarivate, clarify why the confusion existed, and direct your focus to what truly matters for evaluating journal quality now.
In early 2020, Clarivate Analytics, the organization that curates the Web of Science, officially integrated its original SCI list into the larger Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database. This means the separate, smaller SCI list is no longer maintained. All journals that once held the prestigious "SCI" designation are now part of the unified SCIE database. Therefore, the SCIE is the single, authoritative, and definitive index for top-tier international science journals.
When your university, a research grant, or a tenure committee asks for a publication in an "SCI journal," they are referring to a journal that is indexed in the modern SCIE database.
Overview: SCI and SCIE
- SCI (Science Citation Index): Launched in 1964, this was the original, highly selective "core" database. It contained a few thousand of the world's most influential and established scientific journals. For decades, being on this list was the ultimate mark of prestige.
- SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded): Introduced later, the SCIE was created to be more comprehensive. It included every journal from the SCI core list plus thousands of other high-quality, peer-reviewed journals from emerging fields and different regions.
For many years, these two lists existed side-by-side, creating a perception of a two-tiered system. The 2020 merger officially ended this era of confusion.
What Matters Now: Focus on Quality Metrics Within the SCIE
Since the "SCI vs. SCIE" debate is settled, your focus should shift from the journal's name to its performance. The true measure of a journal's prestige and a paper's impact is its ranking within the SCIE database.
This ranking is determined by the annual Journal Citation Reports (JCR), which groups journals into four tiers. For a comprehensive breakdown of how this system works, you can read Complete Guide to Q1–Q4 Quartiles.
The Role of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF)
The quartile rankings are primarily based on a journal's Journal Impact Factor (JIF). This metric is a direct measure of a journal's influence and is calculated annually.
Specifically, the JIF measures the average number of citations received per paper published in that journal during the two preceding years. A higher Impact Factor generally indicates that a journal's articles are, on average, cited more frequently by other researchers, suggesting greater visibility and influence within its field.
While the JIF is a powerful metric, comparing Impact Factors across different scientific disciplines can be misleading. This is precisely why the quartile ranking—which compares a journal only to its direct peers—provides a more valuable and field-normalized context for a journal's true prestige.
Conclusion
It's time for the academic community to move past the outdated SCI vs. SCIE debate.
- The SCI list was merged into the SCIE in 2020. The SCIE is the only list that matters now.
- Use the right language: When you hear "SCI paper," understand it to mean "a paper in an SCIE-indexed journal."
- Focus on what's important: The real question is not if a journal is in the SCIE, but where it ranks within it. Aiming for a high-quartile (Q1 or Q2) journal is the best strategy for a high-impact research career.
For more international academic resource, please visit Aischolar.
